🔗 Share this article

Deductibles. In-network. Out-of-network. Concierge medical services. Personal healthcare costs. Fixed payment. Shared insurance. Insurance consultants. Coverage agents. Medical advisors. ACA. HMO. Preferred Provider Organization. EPO. POS. High Deductible Health Plan. Health Savings Account. FSA. HRA. Explanation of Benefits. Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act. Small Business Health Options Program. Single coverage. Family coverage. Insurance subsidies.

Baffled? You should be. Who understands this complex system? Not the typical business owner. Nor the typical employee. Choosing the right healthcare insurance for companies – or for our families – appears to require it requires advanced expertise in healthcare.

Our Medical System Isn't Just Complicated, It Is Expensive

Based on a recent study, typical households spends $twenty-seven thousand each year on medical coverage (up 6% from last year). Typical employer health insurance cost is expected to exceed $seventeen thousand for each worker by 2026, an increase of 9.5% compared to 2025.

Now the government is shut down due to partisan disputes regarding subsidies that experts say could cause premium increases up to 100% for millions of Americans.

When Might We Seriously Consider Universal Healthcare?

How soon might we genuinely evaluate a national health insurance program here in America? I have to believe we're approaching that point since this situation is unsustainable.

I'm not proposing national healthcare. I'm proposing that our already existing Medicare program – an insurance system – simply expand to include all citizens. Our infrastructure remains intact. The way medical professionals get paid would change. Believe me, they will adjust.

How National Health Insurance Could Function

A national health insurance program would require payments from workers and companies. In comparable systems, a worker earning moderate income pays approximately 5.3% to their healthcare. Their employer must contribute approximately 13.75%.

Does this appear like a lot? Not if you contrast it to what average US resident spends. I know multiple clients who are easily contributing between 8% to 15% of their employee wages for medical benefits. And keep in mind that with inclusive programs, these contributions include retirement benefits, sick pay, parental benefits and unemployment benefits in addition to supporting healthcare facilities. When including these expenses versus our current spending on retirement programs, job loss coverage and paid time off, the difference decreases.

Execution in the US

For America, universal healthcare funding would raise our Medicare tax deduction, a system that is already in place. It ought to be means-based – those at higher income levels would contribute higher amounts than lower-income earners. This includes both worker and employer contribution. And, like much of federal defense, IT, welfare services and infrastructure, the program should be outsourced to third-party administrators rather than a government office.

Advantages for Small Businesses

Universal healthcare coverage would be a significant advantage for entrepreneurs such as my company. It would put us on a level playing field with our larger competitors that can pay for better plans. It would render administration much easier (automatic payroll withholding processed similarly to retirement and healthcare taxes, instead of individual transactions to insurance companies and insurance providers).

It would enable simpler to plan expenses annual expenditures, rather than enduring the complicated (and ineffective) process of negotiating with the big insurance providers that we must do each year. Due to simplification, there would be a better understanding of coverage by our employees – as opposed to the current system where they have to decipher the complexities of existing plans. Additionally there would certainly be less liability for companies since we wouldn't have access to workers' health histories for risk assessment and alternative plans.

Free-Market Viewpoint

I'm as capitalist as possible. But I've learned that public institutions play important functions in our lives, from providing defense to supporting needed infrastructure. Providing healthcare to all through a national insurance system enhances our economy's infrastructure. It's a better, simpler approach for entrepreneurs which hire more than half of the country's workers and fund half of our GDP. It enables for workers to enjoy better health, come to work more often and be more productive.

Considering Challenges

Exist a million considerations I'm not addressing? Certainly. Given rising medical expenses we've seen in recent years, it's clear that the Affordable Care Act isn't functioning very well. And I realize that we're not a compact European nation where big changes are easier to implement. But expanding universal Medicare, even with increased taxation that would be incurred, would still be a better and more affordable strategy both for controlling healthcare costs but providing access to everyone.

Time for Realistic Evaluation

We as Americans, must reduce our own arrogance. Our healthcare system isn't exceptional. We rank well below numerous nations in healthcare quality globally, according to major studies. Perhaps a positive aspect in this present circumstances could be that we take serious examination at ourselves and acknowledge that big changes need to happen.