🔗 Share this article

Just two days before the NYC mayoral election, Michael Lange issued a significant electoral prediction – going beyond the winner overall, and precinct by precinct. The analyst, a political analyst who grew up in New York City, devoted over a decade in progressive politics and has become something of a well-known figure this year for his deep dives into municipal statistics and voter surveys.

He published his extremely precise forecast map – which correctly forecast that the progressive candidate would win while failed to predict Andrew Cuomo’s strong performance – on his Substack, his platform. He has a flair for witty coinages. He highlighted, as an example, the divide between the “commie corridor”, running from Park Slope to Bushwick to a third locale, where he forecasted (accurately) that Mamdani would win by large leads, and the “capitalist corridor” on affluent parts of Manhattan. There, certain media outlets and Wall Street Journal outrank the New York Times” in audience and the majority of electors favored Cuomo, campaigning as a moderate alternative.

Voting Day Patterns and Surprises

What was your election night?

I had to do that because they were dropping around 200,000 ballots into the tally frequently! I was actually somewhat anxious initially: Mamdani was ahead the initial ballots by a dozen percentage points, but came two big batches of votes that came in after that and the advantage went from 12% to 8%. I was worried.

Understand, there was a world in which yesterday went kind of poorly for Mamdani, in which the opponent would have basically increasing his support from the Democratic primary. But the winner gained 500,000 supporters to his primary coalition, and this was critical why he won. He went out and greatly broadened his base from the first round.

Expanding Support

How did Mamdani gain those extra votes from?

He assembled the coalition that the left long aimed for: diverse racially, it’s young, it’s renters and individuals facing cost pressures. He improved considerably with minority communities, everyday New Yorkers, compared to the earlier election. Plus he boosted his core of liberal progressives, youthful radicals, and immigrant groups. Victory required without expanding his appeal.

He created the coalition that the left always wanted to build: diverse, youthful, tenants and residents squeezed by affordability

There were also a number of Trump/Mamdani voters – is this significant?

It’s definitely a real thing, limited to working-class Latinos, Asian communities and Muslims. Voters in immigrant strongholds that supported Trump previously went for Zohran now. However it’s not that he was winning over white working-class voters and Maga voters.

Voter Participation and Effects

One of the big stories of the night was the sky-high turnout. Who benefited?

Both sides. Participation was much greater than I had expected. I figured we might go over two million, but it’s closer to 2.3 million – which is a lot of darn voters. Existed a substantial opposition group, energized, but the Mamdani base was equally driven, and that was enough to secure victory.

You forecasted he’d exceed half the ballots. Is he on course for that?

Currently you would say he’s favored to surpass 50%. He has 50.4% but remain around 200K ballots left to report as of Wednesday morning. Thus it’s not certain, but I think probable, and I hope he does so afterwards none can claim the Republican was a spoiler.

Republican Collapse

The GOP candidate, the Republican candidate, was another surprise. His vote completely collapsed.

He lost any district in any area. Including Tottenville in Staten Island, similar to an 88% Trump neighborhood. That truly was unexpected. Cuomo kept very white areas, affluent zones and devout communities, and then added all of these Republicans on Staten Island with a strong turnout. I believe there was significant tactical voting by GOP voters. This happened before the former president tweeted his support for the candidate, but it assisted. It might have changed the outcome if the winning alliance failed to expand.

Progressive Strongholds

Regarding your much mentioned left-wing base – did backing for the candidate overwhelming in those parts of Brooklyn and Queens?

I think there was a little dilution of the progressive zone in some areas like Astoria or Greenpoint that have more older white ethnic folks. In Astoria, for example, the property owners and residents all went for the independent. Thus there existed a little resistance. But overall, mostly the commie corridor is another huge reason why Zohran won – he was polling between high percentages in specific neighborhoods.

Community Support

In the lead-up to the vote there was coverage on whether the candidate was making inroads with the community. Is there any suggestion that he succeeded?

Exist neighborhoods with many secular and more progressive-leaning Jews – such as Park Slope and Morningside Heights – where he did well. But in the affluent districts like the Upper East Side, his Middle East stance definitely mattered in those places. Similarly in the moderate communities like Forest Hills, Rego Park, or Bronx areas – they all leaned Cuomo. And also, you have newcomers from Eastern Europe in southern Brooklyn, they were strongly supportive. So I don’t know if existed major surprises here, but he retained left-leaning areas and including sections of the another locale by big margins.

Long-Term Significance

Did Mamdani redefine what the city represents in politics? Will the progressive base become a launch pad for leftwing candidates?

Absolutely, it’s not accidental that key figures from progressives hail from a handful of neighborhoods in the boroughs. I’m sure that we’ll see more of that – people will come from these areas to be elevated nationally.

But I think that every city in America can have their own commie corridor. Urban places are the epicenters of progressive influence in America – since they’re young, people rent and they represent locales where individuals struggle by the disparities we face.